| Jim Parks | ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Parks is a newsman, deckhand, farm hand, truck driver and ramblin' man. Keep him away from the fire water and don't mess with his food or his woman. Send him an e-mail at jim@downdirtyword.com. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- Fiction Pro-Life Activists Confront Candidates For Abortion/ Posse Comitatus Act Back In Force Ritual Duel - A Walk In the Park, A Muster In The Sun Obama Signs Off On Repeal By Treaty of the Second Amendment DWI and Drug Offenders: The Case "They Don't Want You To Know About" U.S. Citizens No Longer In Control -United Nations Placed in Charge of National Parks, Monuments Shot By A Gun That Didn't Make Any Noise For the Naked, Nameless, Homeless and Harmless, Morningstar Ranch Was Home Fiction
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro-Life Activists Confront Candidates For Abortion/
On Thursday mornings, the candidates for surgical abortions come to the Planned Parenthood clinic on Waco's Columbus Avenue. It's a quiet and dignified, tree-lined street lined with old money mansions, some of them converted to treatment centers and halfway houses for drug offenders and parolees. There is a very large and imposing red brick Southern Baptist Convention congregation, Columbus Avenue Baptist. Right next door is St. Mary's Catholic Church. Further on downtown, near the Courthouse, is the Masonic Grand Lodge of Texas, A.F.& A.M. Equally imposing, its huge limestone veneer walls are covered with bas relief sculpture of quarrymen, entered apprentices, fellowcraft and master masons working on King Solomon's Temple. They were sculpted by a famous Parisian artist. It's that kind of neighborhood, steeped in the grandeur of a once and future establishment and all its trappings. As it turns out, Columbus Avenue is the home of a curious ritual that has persisted for many years, through heat and snow, drought and violent thunderstorms. Thursday is the day for surgical abortions. About 20 activists attend the Thursday morning vigils, "including children." A leader in the local Pro-Life movement said in remarks at a monthly meeting held today, "I think children should be included." When the patients for surgical abortion arrive, the anti-abortion demonstrators line the driveway and sidewalk in front of the low-slung brick professional building. They try to get the patients who are going inside to terminate their pregnancy to cross the parking lot and talk to them. They carry signs depicting aborted fetuses. They hand out literature.
In fact, the organization pays to lease small billboards plastered with the same message outside the abortion clinics located in Groesbeck, Ross, Temple and other Central Texas communities. It's called "Sidewalk Counseling" and sometimes it's effective. John Pisciotta recalls one couple in particular. They did not stop their car to talk. They went on in the parking lot and sat and talked for 15 minutes. Then they drove away smiling and waving to the sidewalk counselors. "We saved a baby that day. "We're kind of guessing, at times," Mr. Pisciotta told his audience at St. Mary's Fellowship Hall who had gathered after church for a "Second Sunday" spaghetti lunch and to talk about anti-abortion strategy. "We don't really know what goes on inside the abortuary." They call the abortion clinics "abortuaries." Those patients who do not change their minds a leave a little after luch, around one or two p.m. Each one is carrying a single stem red rose in her hand. The staff of Planned Parenthood present them with the roses as they exit. A woman sitting at one of the long lines of cafeteria tables stood and said of the women who go through with a surgical abortion, "They're sad. They're emotionally drained. "You can tell by looking at them. They're carrying a red rose. Planned Parenthood gives them a red rose." Another woman sitting in the audience spoke up and said, "We ought to give each one of them a white rose." Mr. Pisciotta, who said he and his son arrived about 7 a.m. Sunday morning at St. Mary's to prepare the excellent marinara sauce used on the meatballs and bowtie pasta that is typically served at Second Sunday, told his supporters, many of whom have been involved in this ministry for many years, that he would like to hear from them. "Does anyone have anything they want to say?" He invited them to come to the podium and make brief remarks. No one spoke up right away. Mr. Pisciotta waited patiently. A veteran of the sidewalk wars for the lives of unborn children, he added, "Planned Parenthood coaches them very specifically not to talk to us when they come in." He maintains a website for the sidewalk ministry at www.prolifewaco.com. It quotes Proverbs 31:8, "Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute" and "Proverbs 24:11-12, "Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter..." He said, "I think Planned Parenthood should be confronted at every single turn in everything they do...to let people know that this is not a positive force in your neighborhood." When he announced that Ms. Pam Smallwood, long-term director of the Waco Planned Parenthood Clinic, is leaving to take up a post as Chief Operating Office of that organization's Texas Capital Regional Austin office, the throng of almost a hundred crowding the Fellowship Hall burst into applause. Ms. Smallwood is 57 and has held her post at Waco for almost 30 years. She told media outlets in February that her new job at Austin will allow her to narrow her focus solely to patient health care. An announcement that Sarah Palin will address the Pro-Life alternative service, CareNet, to be held in September at Baylor University's Ferrell Center basketball gymnasium, also garnered enthusiastic applause. A former cheerleader and beauty contest winner, Mrs. Palin is the former Governor of Alaska. She was Senator John McCain's Vice Presidential running mate in the elections of 2008. "It's not just for Catholics any more," Mr. Pisciotta said with pride. A final note in these small battles of the culture wars is about the Girl Scouts of America, passing out what the Pro-Life movement terms Planned Parenthood literature at the United Nations in New York City. The flyer reads, in part, "Many people think sex is just about vaginal or anal intercourse... But, there are lots of different ways to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" According to the brochures, "National laws requiring HIV- positive people to reveal their status to their partner(s) "violate the rights of people living with HIV...There are many reasons that people do not share their HIV status. They may worry that people will find out something else they have kept secret, like they are using injecting drugs, having sex outside of a marriage or having sex with people of the same gender." To counter such ideas, the Pro-Life movement holds 40-day Prayer and Fasting rituals. Part of the program, which includes rosaries and masses, is to state and re-state the affirmations, "I believe in chastity; I believe in life; I believe in respect for the unborn." In closing, a man stood and read an old letter to the editor regarding a woman who had given birth to a one-year old child and was again pregnant. She was in a doctor's office asking for relief through his surgical expertise. In the narrative, the doctor is just as willing, in fact prefers, to terminate the life of the one year-old child. He takes up his knife and the woman reacts in horror. The man, a graying gentleman of an age dressed to the nines in brightly polished cowboy boots and a well-fit sport coat and slacks, had a look of triumph upon his face as he regained his seat. At this point, The Legendary chose to leave the room. He had been weeping softly for a half hour and he had become very uncomfortable. It was time for The Legendary to leave because, for God's sake, he was out of paper napkins to dab at his eyes and wipe his running nose. He repeated the Our Father several times on his way home. This prayer, attributed to Jesus, who was said to have been asked, after the Sermon on the Mount when one of the Apostles said, "Rabbi, teach us to pray," gave The Legendary some comfort. War, even cultural war, is hell, as General Sherman said; in its cruelty, you cannot refine it. The Legendary agreed with the General several times as his Chevrolet pickup hummed down Highway 6 toward home. He was left with no choice but to pray. There is no sugar coating available for this conflict. After all, it involves a death in the family. "Jesus wept." Amen. So mote it be. By The Legendary Table of Contents A Photo Essay by Jim Parks
Posse Comitatus Act Back In Force - As Originally Written A clear cut indication of the extent to which members of Congress had become disenchanted with the more extreme neoconservative ideas of the Bush Administration came with the repeal of the Insurrection Act Rider of 2006. This legislation, signed into law in the middle of the night on October 28, 2006, amended the venerable Insurrection Act of 1807 and totally usurped the authority of State Governors to either give or withold their assent and refuse to consent for the President to order Federal troops to take over in times of national emergency.
The original Insurrection Act of 1807 and 1876 made similar provisions, but only allowed those measures to be taken when and if the Governor of a State consented to allow it. Congress passed the 1876 law following the elapse of the 10-year Reconstruction period following the Civil War. Local authorities had prevented many people from voting in elections and receiving due process of law in disputes with both individuals and local governments. The insurrection law was therefore strengthened in an effort to prevent states and local authorities from riding roughshod over an individual's civil rights. For instance, President Eisenhower asked for and got the approval - however grudging - to allow crack Army paratroopers to take over security functions during riots which occurred in reaction to a Federal Court order to desegrate a high school in Little Rock. The crowds were threatening murder, insurrection and other terroristic tactics at the time. Similarly, President Kennedy was able to persuade the Governor of Mississippi to allow troops to be deployed at the University of Mississippi at Oxford during similar unrest over the desegregation of that institution's Law School - something that had been ordered by a Federal Court. The use of Federal troops for law enforcement purposes inside the borders of the United States is prohibited by the Posse Comitatus Act - Latin for, literally, "power of the County." The Federal government must defer to the judgment and consent of local and state officials. Military power resides with the Governor, who is in command of the National Guard. Under the new provisions of Public Law 109-364, which President Bush signed into law, the President could take over in times of an attack on the United States; natural disaster such as hurricane, earthquake, flood or fire; and disease caused by a biological attack or global pandemic. But the worm turned before the year was out. Cooler heads prevailed - before the ink had time to dry on the new law - when the members of Congress who control the government's budgetary purse strings moved that same year to nullify the new law in a rider to the Defense Authorization Act of 2007, H.R. 5122, also known as the John Warner National Defense Act of 2007. Thus, the law changed in 2008, and not without the approval of a sizable majority of moderate members of both houses - on both sides of the aisle. The rider inserted in the defense act by Senators Boyd and Leahy repealed in its entirety the previous wording of the amended form of the Insurrection act of 1807 and 1876 and restored it to its original content in U.S. Code, Title 10, Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 15. In case of a nuclear attack or biological event such as the rapid spread of a pandemic of influenza, plague or smallpox, Federal authorities could force quarantine and subsequent evacuation only if the Governor allows it. Otherwise, the National Guard will remain under the control of the State of Texas, paid by the Federal government, commanded by the Adjutant General Ritual Duel - A Walk In the Park, A Muster In The Sun (June 20, 2009. Issue 6.) The National Mall will soon see a ceremony of the rawest form of ritual combat, a muster of men-at-arms bent on fulfilling an oath they took to "protect and defend" the Constitution of the United States of America "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." On the other hand, there are Federal authorities mulling the implications of the Second Amendment, of a "well regulated militia," and the declaration that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." They will meet on the National Mall, a green space of hallowed ground originally planned for such confrontations and filled with touchstones of the great experiment of the constitutional republic; between the Parthenon of the Lincoln Memorial and the obelisk of the Washington Memorial; hard by the sunken wall, the black stone "V" of the Vietnam Veterans Monument; across the street from the post- revolutionary Federalist Executive Mansion, the White House; and across the river from the Pantheon of the Jefferson Memorial on Saturday, June 13, 2009. Just up the street, the marble basilica of the double-domed U.S. Capitol Building dominates the sky line. There, a similar drama will play out when the Senate ponders the proposed treaty of the Organization of American States, a measure which calls for all member states to pass laws that will prohibit private gun ownership if ratified. In this steely eyed game of brinksmanship, neither side is likely to blink. And so, the second muster of Oath Keepers follows the first muster of the Continental Army held at Lexington Green on April 19, 1775, anniversary of Thus, begun in conflict, the exercise in representative government abides in uncertain times of further conflict, of war, and rumors of war. Gun control advocates in Congress and the Department of Justice seek to increase the strictures already represented by the more than 20,000 firearms laws currently on the books. The schism persists between Courts, as well. A recent Supreme Court holding, Washington, D.C. v. Heller, maintains that it is unconstitutional for a local government to disallow the possession or registration of handguns. The militia consists of armed citizens, not necessarily members of the National or State Guard, according to the majority opinion of Mr. Justice Antonin Scalia. But a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision holds that it is constitutional for a state, or the local government of Chicago and Oak Park, to create law barring the ownership of handguns, something that is considered contrary to U.S. Constitutional law, according to the petitioner, National Rifle Association, in NRA v. Chicago - home of President Obama. "Federalism is an older and more deeply rooted tradition than is a right to carry any particular kind of weapon," according to Judge Frank Easterbrook. That decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court. There is a further complication: President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, was part of a Second Circuit Court of Appeals panel in New York that reached a similar conclusion in January. When the band of active duty military men, veterans, peace officers, and Federal agents, both active and retired, step out on the green, they will reaffirm not only their original oath, one that compels their first loyalty to the law, and not the elected officials whose authority flows from the Constitution, they will also affi 1.) We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people. 2.) We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people 3.) We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as "unlawful enemy combatants" or to subject them to military tribunal. 4.) We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a "state of emergency" on a state. 5.) We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty. 6.) We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps. 7.) We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext. 8.) We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to "keep the peace" or to "maintain control." 9.) We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies. 10.) We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances. Many intelligence and security analysts believe that the thrust of these declarations is meant to counter a National Level Exercise scheduled for later this summer which, for the first time, will concentrate on a pre-emption of terrorism inside the boundaries of the United States and not a foreign adventure, a war on terror. A joint task force of American, United Kingdom and Australian troops will participate. The exercise is expected to follow the outline of a highly classified executive order, NSDP-51, which was promulgated and published by the Bush Administration. The measure would nationalize all communications, transportation, food supplies, labor, and industrial capacities under the authority of the President in case of a national emergency. In effect, the order would nullify the powers of the Congress and the judiciary in favor of the sole authority of executive command. "Lone Star Iconoclast" Military Affairs Editor Captain Eric May has characterized the government's new authoritarian posture in this way. "Post 9/11, there was a counter revolution against the American revolution. I think Oath Keepers is a counter to that counter revolution... "Government has made all its force come to bear against the American people, so Oath Keepers have become a fifth column within the fifth column." Obama Signs Off On Repeal By Treaty of the Second Amendment (May 20, 2009. Issue 5.) A historic war over gun control is brewing between the White House and Senators on both sides of the aisle. During his recent trip to Mexico, President Obama signed off on the United States' ratification of an Organization of American States (OAS) treaty that would criminalize the manufacture, sales, shipment and ownership of firearms and ammunition and of reloading spent ammunition. Soon, the United States Senate will be asked to ratify the "Inter-American Convention Against The Illicit Manufacturing Of And Trafficking In Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, And Other Related Materials." http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/a_res_55/255e.pdf Senate approval would neatly sidestep the Constitution of the United States in its Second Amendment, which guarantees that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In an effort to control international shipment of arms, the OAS adopted the treaty in November, 1997 at the 24th Special Session of the General Assembly when it met at Washington, D.C. So far, all but four of the organization's thirty-four member states have ratified the treaty. They are The United States, Canada, Jamaica and St. Vincent - The Grenadines. Freedom-loving nations such as Argentina, Chile, The Dominican Republic, Haiti, Paraguay, Uruguay, Colombia, Nicaragua and Venezuela have already outlawed the possession, sales and shipment of firearms, except for relics and curios built in the 19th century. That includes ammunition and any accessories - including telescopic sights, high capacity magazines or any other gear that may be attached to them. Dealing in any of these is referred to as "trafficking." All firearms must be numbered and identified under government license and supervision, under the terms of the treaty. The manner of that licensure and supervision is yet to be determined. Bureaucrats will be called forth to promulgate those new regulations if the Senate approves the treaty. Assembling or disassembling firearms without government license and supervision, even for purposes of cleaning, is illegal in those states. Shipment or sales are also illegal, including any part of the whole round meant to be fired - propellant, projectile, primer or cartridge case. That is classified as manufacturing. According to one legal expert who has spent a great deal of time analyzing the 4,078-word document, "..."'Trafficking' is not explicitly limited by 'illicit' and could mean almost anything." The basic conflict will be between the language of the United States Constitution, a document which assigns the role of making law to the Congress, a limited role of making law to the judiciary in its appeals holdings, and the enforcement of laws and treaties by the Executive Department. In the case of international treaties, they may not be enforced without Senatorial ratification, termed as a process in which Senators "advise and consent" to the adoption of treaties and international conventions. The treaty provides for "States Parties that have not yet done so shall adopt the necessary legislative or other measures to establish as criminal offenses under their domestic law the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials." Additionally, the treaty provides that "...the criminal offenses established pursuant to the foregoing paragraph shall include participation in, association or conspiracy to commit, attempts to commit, and aiding, abetting, facilitating, and counseling the commission of said offenses." The conflict that is likely to erupt is reminiscent of the epic efforts of the Woodrow Wilson Administration to gain ratification of the treaty that would have included the U.S. in The League Of Nations following World War One. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DWI and Drug Offenders: The Case "They Don't Want You To Know About" (April 24, 2009. New Moon. Issue 4) by Jim Parks A man convicted of driving while intoxicated sits dejected in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting; his wife, a native of one of Mexico's high desert western states, sits by his side. His dilemma is simple enough. His probation officer, a chicana, has threatened repeatedly that in a worst case scenario, he will be put in the penitentiary, or in jail, if he does not attend the meetings in the frequency and in the sequence she demands. The tension is unbearable because his wife, a woman who was born in Mexico, thoroughly believes that he will be put in the pen. Her reasoning? Back home in Mexico, when a government official makes such a pronouncement, it usually turns out to be true. What, then, would become of her and her child if her husband was locked away in some part of the Texas gulag to atone for the crime of imbibibing too many cervezas frias on the way home from work? It is one of at least a half dozen meetings of the recovery group solely devoted to the seemingly insurmountable problem of this man's insistence that he can make the meetings when and if he chooses, according to when he has the time. Ordered to make a total of eight meetings each month - two per week - the officer alleges he had violated the order by making the majority of them within a period of one week. He attended something like six of them, then spread the other two out over the month. She doubted his sincerity. The setting for this attendant drama is a meeting room in a prominent protestant church at the county seat. The man heaves a huge sigh, looks from his wife's worried countenance to his infant's sleeping form in the car carrier at her side, and back to the group, which is seated in a circle around him. After an aggregate of six hours of listening to the various accounts of this contretemps, another man, who is not on probation and is in attendance only to maintain his sobriety, speaks up and says it's not that simple, this business of ordering a person to be incarcerated in the penitentiary or the jail. The probation officer cannot just snap her fingers and put the man in the jail or penitentiary. There are a number of intricate steps which must be carried out before such a drastic action takes place. First of all, since the probationer was convicted in the remote city of San Angelo, in another State District Court jurisdiction, the local prosecutor will be obliged to write a recommendation to the prosecutor there for a motion for a show cause hearing to explain to the Court why the man's probation should be vacated, the Court should proceed to sentencing, and he should be locked up. At the hearing, the people of the State of Texas would be obliged to make the case, which would require the appearance of the probation officer at that proceeding, a hearing which would be held more than two hundred miles distant. At this point, the chairwoman of the meeting, highly indignant, interrupts him and declares that since he is not an attorney, he has no standing to interpret the law or give legal advice. The interlocutor, exasperated, counters her objection. He is not giving legal advice, he says, but talking about something he has learned in his research of these matters, his exploration of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and Federal case law. After all, he reasons, it's still a free country. Nevertheless, she demands that he be quiet and let the meeting proceed without any further discussion of the law. She accuses him of attempting to act as the man's attorney. The interlocutor explains that the three-pronged test of the charge of practicing law without a license is if an actor unlicensed to practice law promised results, filed court papers on behalf of another person, and accepted payment for doing so. Nothing of the sort is taking place here, he insists. Instead, the people are asked to endure an endless complaint about a problem with no remedy in sight. He is ordered to desist immediately. Oh, he says, then the meeting will be all about how this man is going to the pen? What about the stated subject of recovery from the "disease" of alcoholism, then? Will that mission statement be cast aside because of the threats of a zealous probation officer, someone who demands the incarceration of this offender because he does not attend enough meetings - at least not enough at the times she has specified? It appears discussion of recovery from the disease of alcoholism is out the window; the ceaseless game of cat and mouse will only continue. All of this dialogue is dutifully translated into the Spanish for the benefit of the offender's wife, who sits ashamed, her eyes downcast and focussed on the floor. The chairwoman becomes more insistent; she demands that all such discussion desist at once. The man continues to defy her authority. Due to certain Federal Court holdings, it is not only unconstitutional, but illegal for any authority figure in the United States of America to order any person to attend 12-step recovery program meetings or to threaten any action if compliance is not forthcoming. The truth is this. A person so ordered to attend has the option of voting with his feet and simply walking out of the "spiritual" meeting where, according to its organizers, no "religion" is espoused. AA is "spiritual," not "religious," according to members of AA. Federal Courts have found a way to counter that equivocal line of logic - most recently in a decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco, Inouye v. Kenma. The reason: Since, according to the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...," it is impossible that failure to attend a meeting deemed religious in its nature could be a violation of the law - any law no matter who lays it down or how they do it. Pandemonium ensues. The meeting deteriorates into a shouting match. In fact, though he has opened an emotional can of worms, he is right, entirely correct, but there is more. According to the Inouye holding, handed down recently from the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco, any "coercive" authority who demands attendance at the meetings without offering an alternative, secular program may be sued, individually, for inunctive relief, money damages, and the like, because of the deprivation of an individual's constitutional rights. "This is the law they don't want you to know about," according to a clinical psychologist active in the treatment field. "Our religious or spiritual beliefs (or lack of them) are our personal business, and not something the government is allowed to interfere with." A. Tom Horvath, Ph.D., ABPP, is a board certified clinical psychologist and president of Practical Recovery, an addiction treatment facility in La Jolla (San Diego), CA, focusing on collaborative care and self-empowerment. The facts of Inouye v. Kemna, published on September 7, 2007, are that Ricky Inouye was imprisoned in Hawaii for drug charges and served his time. After his release, his parole officer, a person named Nanamori, ordered him to attend the AA meetings though Inouye, a Buddhist, had previously made an issue out of his objection to the religious nature of the AA steps to recovery. i offered him the choice of attending the meetings, or experiencing a return to prison. Inouye sued Nanamori in U.S. District Court in Hawaii. The suit was unsuccessful because Nanamori claimed the state of law at the time was "fuzzy" on whether AA is religious, or not. Inouye appealed and the Ninth Circuit Court made short work of the controversy. A three judge panel unanimously ruled that a long line of previous cases from across the nation have established that the 12 steps and the nature of the meetings is, indeed, religious. They sent the case back to the District Court in Hawaii, where the ruling consisted of requiring Nanamori, the parole officer, to pay monetary damages to the Inouye estate. In the ensuing time, Mr. Inouye had passed and his son continued the prosecution of the civil rights suit. This development rocked the world of the recovery "community" in all its treatment centers, counseling practices, probation programs and state treatment jails operated by state governments and private contractors alike, contractors such as Corrections Corporation of America, Wackenhut, and their subcontractors. "Based on recent court decisions, if you have been ordered to attend a 12-step group or 12-step-based treatment by the government (the order could be coming from a court, prison officer, probation or parole officer, licensing board or licensing board diversion program, or anyone authorized to to act on behalf of the government}, you have the right not to attend them," wrote Dr. Horvath. "However, you can still be required to attend some form of support group, and some type of treatment," Dr. Horvath has concluded. Those who were previously ordered to attend under coercion and duress may possibly have standing to bring suit for violation of their civil rights. A competent attorney should be consulted if one has strong feelings about their treatment by probation, parole or prison officials, judges or treatment center counselors. Here is a short list of the related cases that led to the Ninth Circuit decision: A New York Appellant sued for relief after he had been denied the privilege of visiting with his family while incarcerated in the state penitentiary because of his refusal to attend AA meetings in the treatment program for drug offenders "when the the program necessarily entails mandatory attendance at and participation in a curriculum which adopts in major part the religious-oriented practices and precepts of Alcoholics Anonymous..." - (Griffin v. Coughlin, 1996 - N.Y. Int. 137) In County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union (492 US 573) and Lemon v. Kurtzman 403 US 602) the Supreme Court held that coercion is present any time a person is required to observe any form of religious observance, even if they are just requested to do the minimum of remaining quiet and not interfering. In spite of the threats of the probation and parole authorities, no one seems to know of a person actually having been incarcerated due to the neglect of attending AA meetings. Some other offense has been alleged and the Court has proceeded to sentencing on the original suspended sentence. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Citizens No Longer In Control - (April 9, 2009. Full Pink Moon. Issue 3) United Nations Placed in Charge of National Parks, Monuments by Larry Goldman and Jim Parks It is only reasonable that an American citizen would believe that the people of the United States have the ultimate authority over the nation's national parks and historic sites - places such as the Statue of Liberty and Independence Hall, Yellowstone Park and Death Valley. Those who notice are shocked to see the bronze plaques in the place where the Congressional delegation signed the Declaration of Independence, framed the Constitution, and began the experiment of self rule in a new Republic. They proclaim that this building in downtown Philadelphia is the common inheritance of humanity at large and has been placed under the control of the United Nations' agency, UNESCO. The same goes for the Statue of Liberty and dozens of other national parks, monuments and historic places. What's more shocking is that the internation control extends to the areas contiguous to their boundaries. For instance, a Montana gold mine has been shut down because it is deemed a hazard to the ecologically sensitive area of Yellowstone National Park - though it is far outside the borders of that national treasure. Why? It all goes back to a treaty President Richard M. Nixon signed in 1973. The Biosphere Treaty proclaims these sites are to be protected in the name and the interest of the world's people. Later, a broader interpretation has been added, the provision that if any industrial process threatens the natural ecology of the site, that mine, fabrication or manufacturing plant, ranch or farming facility must be shut down and the property acquired by the powers that be - the United Nations. Altogether, there are more than 49,433,229 acres affected. How will that authority be maintained? By troops from more than twenty other nations that signed and ratified the treaty. How did all this become the law of the land? Through Executive Order. A president need only publish his order in the Federal Register, then wait for thirty days, and his word becomes law. What part did Congress play in the changes? Well, the Senate would have had to advise and give consent to the original treaty Nixon signed back in 1973, a year before he left Washington, D.C., forever - in total disgrace. President Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12919 on June 3, 1994, a measure that encompassed nine previous Executive Orders that span the decades from the Truman years through the present - orders intended to be used in times of national crisis or emergency. They provide for: #10995 - Seizure of all communications media in the United States; The "Biosphere Reserves" designated under the control of the UN are: · Big Bend National Park (801,163 acres) · Big Thicket Natioinal Preserve (85,750 acres) · Congaree Swap National Monument, S.C. (22,200 acres) · Death Valley National Monument (2,067,628 acres) · Denali Valley National Monument (6,500,000 acres) · Everglades National Park and · Fort Jefferson National Monument (1,571,199 acres) · Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve (7,523,888 acres · Glacier National Park (1,013,572 acres) · Gacier Bay National Park and Preserve (3,283,168 acres) · Great Smoky Mountains National Park (520,269 acres) · Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (229,177 acres) · Isle Royale National Park (571,790 Acres) · Joshua Tree National Monument (559,954 acres) · Kings Canyon National Park (461,901 acres) · Mammoth Cave National Park (52,708 acres) · Noatak National Preserve (6,574,481 acres) · Olympic National Park (922,651 acres) · Organ Pipe National Monument (330,689 acres) · Redwood National Park (110,232 acres) · Rocky Mountain National Park (265,727 acres) · Sequoia National Park (402,482 acres) · Virgin Islands National Park (14,689 acres) · Yellowstone National Park (2,219,791 acres) · Carlsbad Caverns National Park (46,766 acres) · Grand Canyon National Park (1,217,158 acres) · Mesa Verde National Park (52,122 acres) · Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve (13,188,325 acres) · Yosemite National Park (761,236 acres) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oath Keepers (April 9, 2009. New Pink Moon. Issue 3) LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: Let me introduce you to the Militia! That's right, I'm talking about the one you read about in the Second Amendment. Read all about it at - http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/
These men and women are hardheaded about this. They affirm that their loyalty is not to a politician, a party or any group of politicians. They are sworn to defend their nation and their constitution. Period. On Lexington Green, site of the first shots fired in the American Revolution, "We oath keepers will be mustering , gathering forces for the first time, on April 19, 2009 to read aloud declaration of orders. "OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY !. "1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people. 2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people 3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as "unlawful enemy combatants" or to subject them to military tribunal. 4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a "state of emergency" on a state. 5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty. 6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps. 7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext. 8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to "keep the peace" or to "maintain control." 9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies. 10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances." Their stated goal is not to overthrow any part or parcel of any government, federal, state or local, but to insist upon a strict interpretation of the Constitutional underpinnings of any such government. Hear me out and understand me well when I say that I cast my lot with theirs long, long ago in a nation many thought fell apart and died. We have news for them. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blues For Mizmoon (March 26, 2009. New Moon. Issue 2) She wrote something hard and scratchy, a she cat with the blues wearing a red slip, something worthy of a woman's worst wrist-cutting moods. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Butterfly Woman (March 5, 2009. Issue 1) She never wore shoes. She never wore clothing except for a wrap and a floppy straw hat on her way up and down the cliff between her house and the beach. One morning she whistled. Reclining atop a driftwood log, she crooked a finger, said "Call me Jane." In a redwood grove atop the cliff, she reclined and pointed a leg at the sky. I straddled the other, holding on for dear life. I shouted her name when I could no longer contain myself. Butterflies whirled amid shafts of sunlight streaming down among the ancient trees. I sprouted wings, flew. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shot By A Gun That Didn't Make Any Noise (March 26, 2009. New Moon. Issue 2) Tim Hix died the first week of March - still waiting for his claim to be approved. He died in agony and intense pain caused by his tumors. He told me this."I can take the dying; I just can't stand the pain." - Editor This article appeared in "The Lone Star Iconoclast," which is published at Crawford, Texas, home of the western White House. It was part of a series detailing the Bush administration's record on veterans affairs. The voters returned the Democrat Chet Edwards to his seat in the l7th District, choosing him over a Republican candidate backed by a fellow constituent, President George W. Bush. Edwards's seniority on the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Veterans Affairs assured him the chairmanship. He, in effect, now signs the checks for all such VA expenditures. Shot By A Gun That Didn't Make Any Noise Eberle had sailed for South Atlantic patrol, based on Recife, Brazil. When she intercepted the German blockade runner Karin, sailors from Eberle boarded. The demolition charges set by the Germans exploded, killing half the 14-man boarding party outright. The remaining seven persisted in their heroic efforts to save the Karin and obtain information until fire and further explosions forced them to abandon ship. They and 72 prisoners were picked up from the water by Eberle. Representative Bob Filner, D-CA., of the 51st District which covers San Diego, chair of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, plans to amend the law to include Blue Water sailors excluded by the Bush Administration's arbitrary and capricious policy change. - Editor |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Naked, Nameless, Homeless and Harmless, Morningstar Ranch Was Home (March 5, 2009. Issue 1) Picture this. A couple of uptight bureaucrats - you know the kind, good gray men with seniority, white shirts and ties, training, civil service status - have come to inspect the dwellings and sanitary facilities at an "open land" commune in sixties California. As they approach the gate to the 31-acre property in the redwoods situated in the middle of apple orchards near Sonoma County's Russian River, they are met by a committee - most of whom are stark naked. In fact, one man who never missed these confrontations was a tall black giant, his afro and ebony skin glistening in the California sun, white teeth glittering as he beamed at the officials with a huge grin, a nude white woman under each arm. Tied around his abnormally large male member there was always a pink ribbon done up in a fancy bow. These confrontations persisted for years and they always began the same way. "Who is in charge here?" the bureaucrat, building inspector, health code enforcement officer or sheriff's department investigator would inquire. No one seemed to be able to give a clear answer to the question. Now, it was a fair question, but it seemed it was always very difficult to answer. It was like the scene in the Vietnam war movie "Apocalypse Now," an adaptation of a Joseph Conrad story that had nothing to do with Vietnam and everything to do with authority and power relationships. "Hey, soldier, do you know who's in command here?" The reply, cheeky and matter of fact and succinct, "Yeah." The character had nothing further to say. Just, "Yeah." They were in the middle of a firefight at a bridge head and he knew who was in charge there. "Yeah." Vietnam. California. Berkeley. Communes. Universities, the military, corporations, powerful institutions of any kind. You name it. People just kept on doing things to let the The Man know HE was no longer necessarily the one in charge. The critics panned it, the politicians and pundits now deride it, but one thing is for certain, the era of free love, peace, social experimentation, alternative lifestyles - all these things that shook the American culture to its roots - just kept challenging that central concept in ways too numerous to define. Dominance ranking, as the sociologists call it and measure it by such factors as disposable income and leisure time, was sliding and tipping disastrously, rather like an elegant sterling tea service on a gleaming teak table in a salon in a bounding, rolling yacht on an ocean in a snotty blow. The Man kept asking the same question and he kept getting the same answer. Do you know who's in charge here? "Yeah." So this was a daily scene at the socially experimental Morningstar Ranch, a counterculture enclave that flourished near Occidental, California, situated in the apple orchards and redwood groves of Sonoma County's Russian River country, the neighborhood where the apples are grown, Luther Burbank developed the seedless grape, and some of the finest California varietal vintages are produced. What was really proven? Quite a lot, really. Mostly, it was about power relations - who has it, who doesn't, and why. Lou Gottlieb owned the ranch after he bought it from John Henry Beecher, grandson of Harriet Beecher Stowe, the abolitionist author of Uncle Tom's Cabin, whom President Abraham Lincoln claimed was "the little lady who started all the trouble." Mr. Beecher lost his property when he lost his position as a teacher at San Francisco State University because he refused to sign a "loyalty" oath. After amassing thousands of dollars in fines and court- ordered fees to bulldoze buildings ruled improperly constructed on his own property, Lou Gottlieb deeded the property to God. All this controversy wound up in the U.S. Ninth Circuit District Court of Appeals, which ruled that if God was named owner of real property on a quit claim deed, then there would be no recourse for the collection of property taxes. Therefore, God has no property rights in the state of California. It was a typical joke for the wise-cracking Gottlieb, who earned a Ph.D. in musicology at UC Berkeley and fronted the folk song trio, "The Limelighters" playing upright double bass on the weekly television program "Hootenany" after he arranged many of The Kingston Trio's hit songs. Think "There's Going To Be A Meeting" and "It Takes A Worried Man (To Sing A Worried Song)." Gottlieb had a concert grand he put in a hen house at the Morningstar Ranch. There, he played Brahms and other classical works. He meditated, did yoga and clowned while his sidekick, another musician named Ramón Sender Barayón, the son of Ramón J. Sender, the exiled Spanish novelist, played it straight. Sender was literally born amid the sound of machine guns during "Red October," within close proximity of the opening battles of the Spanish Civil War, in 1934. His father, a native of Aragon, was a member of Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista, or P.O.U.M., the Trotskyist militia whose ranks were filled with international volunteers, including such literary luminaries as George Orwell, author of 1984. He worked as a journalist covering the revolution. One of the party's founders later served as his literary agent in America after they had both reached New York. One of Spain's great modern novelists, Sr. Sender wrote the novel Mr. Witt Among The Rebels, for which he won the prestigious Spanish National Prize for Literature in 1936. He was nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970 for the body of his other work, including some which have been translated. They are Pro Patria, Seven Red Sundays Counterattack In Spain, Chronicle Of Dawn, The Sphere, Dark Wedding, and The Affable Hangman. The Stalinist government of the Soviet Union controlled the funds and the supplies of the Republican effort to resist the Fascist forces commanded by Generalissimo Francisco Franco. During that conflict, the P.O.U.M. brigades found it increasingly difficult to find the means to resist the fascists. At one point, the Stalinists actually attacked the P.O.U.M. troops, though they were on the same side. One night at the height of the war, a death squad jerked Ramon's mother Amparo out of a jail cell and frog marched her to a cemetery in her home town of Zamora in the province of Castile. There, paid fascist firing squad of assassins cut her down where she stood before a wall and buried her in a squalid grave after the local priest refused her absolution. Sender, Sr., was able to get his two children, Ramón and Andrea, out of Spain. They eventually arrived in New York in 1939, stateless, homeless refugees because the senior Sender was on the run in Mexico, dodging the Stalinist operatives who were still hunting down and killing supporters of Leon Trotsky, as they had killed Trotsky himself in Mexico City in 1940. Indeed, he considered the truth of the demise of his wife so sensitive that he took the secret to the grave in 1982 when he succumbed to a heart attack after a long career publishing his novels and teaching in various universities. It was only through meticulous research that Ramon Sender Barayón, his son, was able to piece together the truth of his mother's execution. He wrote "A Death In Zamora" and published it to respectable reviews in 2003. Today, forty years after the open land experiment at Morningstar Ranch with Lou Gottlieb and such leading lights of the hippie movement as the Diggers, Sender sits in a bay window in a house high on a crazy hill on a sunny San Francisco street where fog comes pouring over a mountain on certain days. He roughs the tangled fur of his wiggly little dog, "Ricky Ricardo." Asked how to lead and govern several hundred free spirits through gentle suggestion at the height of the psychedelic revolution, the Summer of Love, he readily responds, with no hesitation, "Buy a cow." Buy a cow? "Buy a cow." Why buy a cow? Near exasperation, Ramón Sender Barayón peers over the top of his half lens reading glasses and speaks very slowly, with the voice of experience, with exaggerated patience. Because twice a day that cow needs to be milked. Everyone will come to watch or to get some milk or to socialize - or whatever. All you need to do to get their attention is to make sure the cow is doing fine, that everyone gets some milk, and you can communicate with them with no problem. Here sits one of the earlist experimenters with electronic keyboards, or MOOG synthesizers, one of the organizers of the San Francisco Trips Festival of 1966, a joint venture composed of himself, Stewart Brand, Lou Gottlieb, Phil Graham, The Grateful Dead, Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters, Big Brother and the Holding Company and many other bands as well as the signature light shows that later became the standard for rock concerts - all staged at the ILWU Longshoreman's Hall, all staged over a three-day period in January of 1966. He is very obviously a Spaniard. You can see it in the flowing gray hair, the bushy eyebrows, the heavy beard, the exaggerated gestures when he speaks. He insists that if I ever suddenly find myself situated on prime property in a garden state suddenly overrun by the homeless, helpless, naked and nameless, I should buy a cow. It's the first lesson, he told me. Well, it's a start. Indeed, all good stories have a beginning. The middle of this story is another thing entirely. Some would say the demise of the ranch through the intervention of the bureaucracy and the court orders to bulldoze the property was the end of the story. But that's not true. The end, obviously, is nowhere in sight. At least, not from where Ramón Sender Barayón and Señor Ricky Ricardo sit looking out that bay window on that crazy hill in San Francisco. The people who lived at Morningstar Ranch scattered like seeds before a whirlwind. Many of them perished on the streets from where they had come. There are many horror stories involving the retribution of gang wars, political assassination, drug overdoses and outright death by exposure and disease. Others have thrived in places far and wide, most of them "on the land" at other communes in the west. Sender continues to chronicle all that in an evolving e-book he calls "Home Free Home." Very interesting reading, it may be found in "The Digger Archives" at: http://www.diggers.org/home_free.htm The Diggers were an almost mythical commune of people who tended to the needs of the burned out hippies during the Summer of Love. They gleaned produce and scored fish and meat from vendors who were willing to share. They printed instant newspapers on an old multilith in the back of a newspaper delivery van and distributed them to people hungry for information. And they gardened. Morningstar was one of the places where they maintained thriving gardens, the produce of which they hauled into San Francisco to feed starving hippies from everywhere who had arrived without a clue as to what they would do next, where their next meal was coming from, or where to go when their luck ran out. What were some of the lessons learned? First of all, what of the revolutionary idea propagated by Lou Gottlieb, an ex-member of the American Communist Party, that all should work in harmony in "removing the Territorial Imperative from the human heart"? Lou Gottlieb called it LATWNID, or "land access to which no one is denied." Ramón Sender remembers events this way. There were many fits and starts, legal hassles and emotional public meetings. "Anyway, the fact is that from the first get-go we terrified a whole lot of people." Why? Because, according to one popular definition of the concept by Robert Ardrey, the playwright turned anthropologist, who proposed the notion of human territorial aggression in "The Territorial Imperative," published in the 1960s, humans, like animals, are compelled by instinct to possess and defend territory they believe belongs exclusively to them...Territory enhances an animal's prestige and improves chances for survival. It was his idea that this dynamic drives human aggression. Gottlieb sought an experimental solution to this thing of human aggression. He saw it as a problem, and that generated a lot of fear, according to his sidekick, Ramón Sender. The fears all that generated in the minds of the neighbors fell along several well-worn lines. First, they saw the free land movement "...corrupting our children, which I would rephrase (as) 'offering the younger generation an alternative to the Consensus Reality rat race.'" Secondly, hippies running around naked, gardening, meditating and making babies they saw as "lowering real estate values." Parenthetically, according to Sender, "...actually it's the value of the dollar decreasing..." Neighbors perceived "an increase of crime in the area, including mostly burglary and trespassing." They suspected "Cultivation of illegal substances such as marijuana, and probably some of the more paranoid thought we were cooking meth." They feared "The spread of sexually transmitted diseases into the population, along with hepatitis. "'Dirty Hippies' was considered one word." What lesson did Ramon Sender learn when Gottlieb deeded the property to God? No one knows who instigated the move. A woman friend of his interrupted his morning meditation to tell him about Lou's problems with the law, the magnitude of his legal fees and court costs. It wouldn't have been a bad idea to deed Morningstar to God. Within a few weeks, that's what Lou Gottlieb did. Later, he learned that John Henry Beecher had already deeded the property to The Goddess "because he was a member of the Catholic lay order of the Third Order of St. Dominic which occasionally met on the property. "They consecrated the ranch to the Holy Mother and named it after her, 'Morning Star.'" Many people had seen a mysterious vision, the figure of the "Divine Mother," strolling through the trees from time to time, he recalls. Ironically, that may have offered a legal avenue to certification as a tax-exempt and religious enclave community, according to Sender. "...Lou discovered unfortunately too late to help with the appeal of the deed to God, that under Islamic law, it is possible to deed real property to Allah. It's caled a 'waqf.'...Whether Islamic law could have any standing in an American court would be interesting to research, but it seems to me that it could be argued that, under the First Amendment, Lou could, if he converted to Islam, make a waqf of Morning Star to Allah." Finally, did the ultimate defeat of the community because of non-compliance with building codes spell success for the principles of freedom? "Or do you mean 'spell defeat for the principles of freedom'? I think that's you intended to say," said Ramón. "ABSOLUTELY NOT! Okay, so Morning Star was a disaster in the sense that it could never have become a viable community, at least at that time and place, because it was too close to neighbors and too anarchistic in its basic Digger philosophical thrust to have ever organized itself into a self-supporting enterprise. I personally viewed Morning Star as an alternate society shrine where people came to be healed, just like at Lourdes. Other than live-in staff, there only should've been been visitors who stayed as long as necessary and then moved on, taking their healing and the message with them. And many did just that." Many a young man or woman who had abandoned their lives somewhere in America and come to the Haight to see what would happen wound up totally zonked on psychdelics or other drugs and were basically wandering around stray and at loose ends, incapable of caring for themselves. The Diggers picked them up, brought them to the ranch, and they spent their first night under a tree sleeping while the condensation dripped on them. In the morning, they found a communal stove in the middle of a meadow where people were preparing some sort of breakfast of oatmeal or soup. As the days went by, they scored canvas or sheet plastic and made a lean-to, then found a way to build a little structure. Some helped out with the gardening. Others went on runs with the Diggers to score food, lumber, anything that could be used to help build the community. At one point the three septic tanks on the 31-acre place were streaming effluent downhill on the surface of the ground. It all served to madden the public officials and the neighbors. There were issues of public health and safety to consider. But wasn't that exactly the point, according to Gottlieb and Sender, the two seeming radicals who dared to beg the question? At some point, faced with their confrontational style, one had to ask oneself, what, exactly is radical and what is conservative? Every night an estimated 88,000 people bed down on the streets of Los Angeles. They have no home other than the sidewalks, alleys, public parks, vacant houses and homeless shelters. "If pot's allowed as 'medical marijuana,' then living on the land and building your own simple dwelling should be considered 'medical voluntary poverty' or some-such. And I'd love to find some expert willing to testify to the salubrious effect of not having to pay money to live on some slice of Mother Earth," said Ramón Sender Barayón. Every so often, he and The Rev. Keenan C. Kelsey. Pastor, Noe Valley Ministry where Ramón retired as the Administrative director of the Ministry and Community Center, submitted a proposal to the San Francisco Mayor and County Board of Supervisors that would allow a triage of homeless by the Social Services Department. "Proposal: If a person wants to camp out in nature, offer them a 'nature camp' where they can build themselves a lean- to in a hospitable climate (not too cold, not too hot) grow their food, raise some chickens, learn some crafts, and wait for their soul to regenerate. The basic axiom is that Nature is the Greatest Healer." Where would they do this? On part of the sixteen million acres contolled by the Bureau of Land Management or by The State of California. "Lumber, livestock, water, gardening equipment and food stamps would be provided." The triage would be determined by the Department of Social Services's placement in one of three groups. "Group 1) Willing to be trained and employed. These would remain in the city. "Group 2) Physically or mentally disabled or drug-addicted, These would be placed in treatment centers, but many of the so-called mentally disabled would benefit by being placed in Group 3. "Group 3) Unwilling to be trained but willing to 'return to nature' under minimum supervision, following the time-out center therapeutic concepts of R. D. Lang, et. al...Group 3 Program Participants would be encouraged to build their own living quarters - in the 1960s, on the so-called 'open door hippy enclaves,' we found this to be a very important aspect of the rehabilitation program. The participants would be encouraged to create a self-sufficient homestead. The basic model somewhat parallels The Civilian Conservation Corps of the 1930's. These TOIN Camps (Time Out In Nature Camps), scattered through isolated areas of the state, would also provide on-site volunteer fire fighting teams during the fire season. "Why don't you take your TOIN (Time Out In Nature)?" could become a catch phrase. Under the doctrine of LATWIDN, or, that is, Gottlieb's notion of Land Access To Which Is Denied No One, the core idea is to move people onto the huge amount of land that is not in use. Nine-tenths of the nation's population lives on about one tenth of its land mass. The people of America are now bottled up as never before, according to Ramón Sender Barayón. At first, people arrived in outlaw fashion by being transported from Europe against their will. Later, the huge amounts of vacant land on the North American continent beckoned when people found it hard to fit in or they were starved out of their villages to make a convenient labor pool in the industrial cities. Today, the marginal are left to wander the streets until they die. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In The Barber Shop (March 5, 2009. Issue 1) In the Metropolitan that Tuesday morning, all was brilliant refracted sunlight from the prism edges of the mirrors and the dull shine of polished dark-stained wood. The tiny hexagonal floor tiles gleamed from a fresh scrubbing and the air was redolent with shaving soap, liniment and tonic. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
La Mome (March 5, 2009. Issue 1) Her voice came booming out of the old Victrola speakers as if it had traveled from France to the moon and back to our town on the prairie. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzzy (March 5, 2009. Issue 1) When the boat trailer topped with the big cage pulled into Ralphie's driveway, we kids came running. Something was up. Then his grandfather's big old Buick ambled up to the curb, its HAM radio antennae brushing the lower branches of live oak. The old car looked as if it was a smiling chrome toothed beast, its fat, squat body two-toned and the big tires sporting white walls at least six inches wide. Ralphie jumped into his arms when he swung the door open. We all crowded around to look at the big radio under the dash board with its glowing tubes still shining light from under the dash. Rufus slowly got out and stood deferring to his arthritic knees and hips, his double pleated khakis riding up almost under his tits and held up by wide red suspenders, his iron gray crew cut brushy and looking like a warrior's roached style. His trifocals topped off the wrinkled face over the clipped military mustache. Everything about him shouted that he came from a previous century, a different time, a different place. "What's that, grandpa?" Ralphie kept asking, plucking at his trouser legs and pointing at the big cage on his uncle's boat trailer. "What's what?" his grandfather said, looking all around, up and down the street, in the sky and the back seat of the Buick. "What?" "That!" Ralphie pointed with even more insistence. The rest of the kids chimed in. Rufus looked everywhere but at the trailer. He scratched his head and tapped a Lucky Strike out of a package he took from one of the double set of breast pockets on his starched white shirt. Then he took a very long time to tamp the tobacco on a Zippo he pulled from his other breast pocket before he lit it and savored the first drag. The kids all swarmed to see the prize loaded on the boat trailer. It was clearly a cage made of reinforcing bar with chicken wire laid over it, a door in one end and various perches built inside made from of small tree limbs and branches. It was about ten feet long and eight feet wide, built so it would fit precisely on the trailer with no overhang. When the grandfather walked over with two smaller cages he had taken from the trunk of his Buick, all the kids did a double take. They crowded around and exclaimed their delight. This was too cool. In one cage was a proud, arrogant, erect raven with a huge black beak and the blackest, glossiest feathers you could imagine. In the other were two squirrels. "Grandpa!" Ralphie said, his mouth open, pointing to the animals. He stood beaming, dressed in his shorts and barefooted, wearing no shirt, bronzed by summer days in the swimming pool and playing baseball in the playground. Rufus shrugged, carefully tapping ash from his Lucky and nodding. "Are we going to put them in that cage?" "You bet we are," the grandfather said, blowing smoke in a thin stream into both of his nostrils, then holding it and exhaling perfect smoke rings in the still, muggy summer air. This grandfather was really a very special character. He had been an ambulance driver in The Great War, the one that ended in 1919, long before all our dads had served in World War Two and Korea. He married a German girl, Ralphie's grandmother, who still spoke with a thick accent, and brought her home. Though he hadn't worked as a machinist in twenty years, he still kept his breast pocket filled with a small steel gauge, a set of calipers and plenty of mechanical pencils. I thought of the old picture album bound with black ribbon he had casually left on the tool bench in the garage. We had all lain on our stomachs for hours peering at the old snapshots of battle field scenes from World War One, glimpses in gray and black on washed out white backgrounds of moments in time in Belgium and France. There were zig zag trenches filled with dead men bloated by decomposition, their heavy woold uniforms stretched tight; there were barbed wire fences upon which other corpses hung, their rifles fallen at their sides, their limp hands dangling uselessly where they had stopped moving at the moment of death. Dozens and dozens of shots depicted long, straight trenches with the naked corpses of dead soldiers neatly arrayed shoulder to shoulder, the photos fading away into infinity. In some, there were bulldozers shoving the dirt in over the tops of their bodies. In occasional cases, blankets or a makeshift shelter built from cast off wood covered a corpse or two. Ralphie had pointed to one of these and asked the purpose of such a thing. "Friends of his did it so there wouldn't be no dirt shoveled in his face, how come," his grandfather said, spitting snuff in a soft drink bottle and hitching his pants over his massive belly. Oh, he was a very unusual grandpa, that he was. He brought his photo album from home to show us after we had failed to heed the admonishment of a neighbor lady who demanded that we hold the noise down during our war games. We had no idea why shouting "Bang, bang, you're dead, sucker!" would upset a middle aged lady during a perfectly ordinary summer afternoon. He told us he was going to "learn" us a thing or two about war. I described all this to my mother as I stood barefoot beside her She was busy stirring the contents of pots and pans, trying to get dinner on the table. "Oh, boy, just don't worry about it," she said, glancing at the clock while she took the cover off a sauce pan with one hand and glanced inside, then cracked the oven door to see about some cornbread she was baking. She sighed, routing a sweaty tendril of hair behind her ear and mopping her brow with the hem of her apron. "But, mama," I began. She stopped abruptly and pointed the spoon in my face, almost making my eyes go crossed. "You stay away from the morbid old son of a bitch, you hear me?" I learned then and there to keep my mouth shut about the wonders of the war in which Ralphie's grandpa fought. It wasn't up for discussion with my mama. As quickly as Ralphie's uncle Eddie had the ropes off the cage, the two of them picked it up and carried it around the side of the house. They put it under a pecan tree in the back yard. That was when the old man ceremoniously shooed us out of his way and stepped inside the cage alone. He held the wooden box with one side covered with chicken wire up beside a roost made from the trunk of a sapling and opened the raven's cage. Then the kids could see the raven had one bad wing. It hopped onto the roost cocking its head from side to side and cawing loudly. The squirrels immediately scampered up a smaller sapling to a nest in the corner of the cage made from a wooden packing crate and covered with burlap. They immediately came back outside with pecans they had found stashed inside their nest and sat on the limb working on them, neatly stripping the shell away from the meat of the nut and eating them with precise bites. The raven preened his feathers with his beak, dipping it under his good wing and trying in vain to reach the other side of his body and his broken wing. Why did he put the beak under his wing? We all wanted to know. The old man explained that there was a kind of bird grease under there that came from glands. The bird was greasing himself up to make the tendrils of his feathers stick together, to make it easy to fly. "They all do it," he said as he went through the ceremony of lighting another Lucky Strike. "Y'all had chickens and ducks, geese, you'd know that." This time he threw back his head and blew the smoke in a long, thin gray stream almost straight up. What was his name? We all wanted to know. "His name is Ko-lo-neh," the old man said, zippng his lips as if they were the closure of a leather bomber jacket after he spoke the name. What did that mean? "It means the raven," Rufus said. Grandpa Rufus was a native of the Big Thicket deep in the east Texas woods. It was the name the Cherokee had given Sam Houston long ago. It wasn't until several years later that I learned what they meant, that the huge white man, the professional soldier, was like a carrion crow feeding on the dead. "I want to call him Buzzy," Ralphie said. Why? "Because when he gives his cry, it starts out with a buzzing sound," Ralphie said gleefully, his eyes gleaming while he stared at this magnificent new pet. That was how the summer of Buzzy started. We experimented with what he would eat, killing toads and small snakes for his culinary delight. We found out he totally rejected the kind of food humans liked, puny items such as lettuce and squash. Buzzy wanted meat. Dead meat. There were secret missions with flash lights to check on him after dark. His eyes glowed in the rays we shone upon them. Of course, we begged to sleep out under the sky with our blankets and mosquito nets. We read aloud Edgar Allan Poe's magnificent poem about the raven who haunted him o'er many a volume of forgotten lore as he pondered weak and weary. We fed the squirrels pecans. It was a daily ritual. Ralphie had a private zoo in his back yard. Rufus came back often. One day he fetched Buzzy down from his perch. I was terrified as he calmly reached up and took the wild bird under his body, lightly grasping the creature and holding him out to Ralphie while the rest of us watched from outside the case. Ralphie took him from his grandfather. He held him at arm's length. He stood mesmerized, held deeply in the force of the bird's unblinking stare. Suddenly, the crow lunged his supple neck forward, tilted his head and snapped the long, razor sharp beak. He took a sizable chunk of meat out of Ralphie's upper lip just under the septum. Ralphie struggled to keep from bursting into tears. He stood unbelieving that Buzzy would do something like this to him. "Turn him loose! Turn him loose!" Rufus shouted. Ralphie thrust him away with the same motion he had used when the bird attacked, then released him. If Ralphie had not done this and at the same time jerked his head back, his injury would have been much more severe. The grandfather stood and stared at him. "He did it because you scared him. I think you squeezed him too hard. He thought you were going to harm him. You see, an animal like that bird is wild. They do not trust humans. They cannot afford to. Let that be a lesson to you." Ralphie stood with tears starting to trickle down his cheeks. "I think he was aiming at your eyes, Ralphie." I said it loudly, excited. When the bird attacked, I had retracted my head, too, even though I was standing outside the cage. I could taste brass and smoke in my mouth, that aftertaste of shock and adrenaline. Rufus turned to look at me through those coke bottle glasses. He appeared disgusted with me. "I think your mama is wondering where you are. Why don't you run along?" "I..." "Go on, boy. Get outta here," he said, ushering Ralphie out of the cage, giving him his handkerchief to dab at the blood. Ralphie had struggled to the highest perch in the cage. He was caw caw cawing like mad and flapping his one good wing. Ralphie's mother came out of the house and scolded Rufus. Ralphie began to wail, crying as she escorted him to the house. The old man sat heavily at the family's picnic table, staring at us kids. "Y'all scat. Right now!" He clapped his hands very loudly. The next day our mothers took us on a picnic at the park downtown near the zoo. When we got back, the cage, Buzzy and the squirrels had disappeared. Ralphie came our door crestfallen, his shoulders stooped, a hump in his back as he told me the news. He tried hard not to cry, but he did. When the tears and snot flowed into his bandage, he had to pull it off, a sodden mess. It was ugly because the wound hadn't scabbed over yet. I got him a paper towel from the kitchen. We played cowboys and Indians, then we got up an impromptu game of kick the can with a couple of the other guys. When it got dark, his mom called him several times while he ignored her. Then she called our phone number. My mother told him his mother wanted him on the phone. He mumbled something into the receiver, then hung it up where it perched in the little cul de sac in the hallway. He sounded very resentful when he said, "Okay. All right." I walked him home. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||